« Citizen Journalism and the Culture of Sharing | Main | What Are You Willing to Risk? »

June 30, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c86669e200d834814a8f69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Serendipity Strikes! :

Comments

A. Adam Glenn

Amy wonders about the issue of independence in writing about this story, in which she and a local community leader are involved.

I wouldn't worry if what's she's talking about is approaching the incident in the way a columnist or editorial writer might. That is, in a clear first-person voice showing her involvement and viewpoint. In that form, it makes a fine piece of citizen journalism (or any journalism).

On the other hand, I wouldn't suggest a journalist try to write a straight, "impartial" news account of an event in which he or she were directly involved. As Amy suggests, without the transparency, that would be less than honest.

Let's not forget that newspaper columnists or editorial writers can be as much a journalist as the folks that fill the regular news pages. I wouldn't say the two are indistinguishable, and there are problems with switching between the two forms, but they're definitely both practicing journalism. So why not say the same of citizen journalists with a point a view?

Amy Gahran

Those are good points, Adam. Let's take this discussion a bit further.

Are you saying that since I was involved in helping neighbors address the mosquito problem, and I helped bring the local goatherd into the picture, that I do not have sufficient independence to write a news story about how my neighborhood is addressing the skeeter problem?

My Take: Personally, I think I *could* -- provided that I adhered scrupulously to the ethic of transparency (including full disclosure).

Here's the thing: There are damn few journalists out there covering local or niche news. It's very like that, in terms of a portion of the population, there will be damn few people interested in doing citizen journalism.

I foresee that in many (if not most cases) the people who will be most motivated to face the challenges and demands of citizen journalism will be people who will already be interested or involved in a topic to some extent. Why should these people be excluded from doing journalism, as long as they strive for objectivity, balance, and offer full disclosure of their own involvement? Seems like putting the ethical cart before the horse, to me.

Thoughts?

- Amy Gahran

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

SUBSCRIBE to I, Reporter

Search I, Reporter

  • Search I, Reporter
    I, Reporter

The Editors

I, Reporter Stats


Comment Policy

  • Anyone is welcome to add a comment to any posting in this blog. Any comment that includes spam, obscenity, copyright infringement, rudeness, proprietary information, or obvious risk of libel will be removed at once. We expect all comments to be on-topic and civil -- no flame wars here, please.