« Could Citizen Journalists Have Saved These Lives? | Main | links for 2006-01-27 »

January 26, 2006

UK: New "Code of Practice" for "Witness Contributors"

Today in Journalism.co.uk, Jemima Kiss reports that the British National Union of Journalists has published its new "code of practice" for what it calls "witness contributors."

See: "Union launches code of practice for use of citizen journalism." Kiss notes that the code is intended "for publishers of citizen journalism designed to encourage responsible and ethical use of user-generated material."

The NUJ code document itself doesn't appear to be available as a regular web page, but you can download it as a Word document. (Get the document.)

I read through this document (it's short). While it's probably useful within its oddly narrow focus, I think it's ignoring the big picture -- and the potential -- of citizen journalism...

WHY JUST "WITNESS CONTRIBUTORS?"

Although the document doesn't define the term "witness contributors," it seems to refer to a subset of citJ content: on-the-spot, first-person photos and reports contributed by bystanders. A typical example would be the cell phone photos posted to Flickr of last year's Tube bombings in London.

Yes, that's an important part of citizen journalism, and news organizations and citizen journalists can benefit from having guidelines which address that type of content.

However, what about citizen journalism that involves real reporting, investigation, and analysis? What about group or collaborative projects? Which provisions might guarantee transparency, and what kind of flexibility in the traditional Western journalistic tenet of "objectivity" might be allowable?

Citizen journalism can do much more than provide spot coverage of breaking news. It also has different strengths, benefits, and challenges from news organizations. Hopefully NUJ will consider how to address the bigger picture, and potential, of citJ in the future -- and not just in a specific document, but in its efforts, practices, and perhaps even its membership. 

But for now, this code is a start. That's progress.

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

SUBSCRIBE to I, Reporter

Search I, Reporter

  • Search I, Reporter
    I, Reporter

The Editors

I, Reporter Stats


Comment Policy

  • Anyone is welcome to add a comment to any posting in this blog. Any comment that includes spam, obscenity, copyright infringement, rudeness, proprietary information, or obvious risk of libel will be removed at once. We expect all comments to be on-topic and civil -- no flame wars here, please.